ENDOSCOPIC EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH DYSPHAGIA

Main Article Content

Dr Muhammad Umar Farooq
Dr Arif Rasheed Siddiqui
Dr Syed Afzal Ul Haq Haqqi
Dr Zea Ul Islam Farrukh
Dr Muhammad Danish Ashraf Wallam
Dr Syed Rohail Ahmed Rizvi
Dr Fahad Kakar
Dr Saad Niaz

Abstract

Objective: Dysphagia is a commonly encountered complaint with which patients present to the Gastroenterology clinic. Endoscopy serves as the primary diagnostic tool to identify the underlying cause and guide appropriate treatment. Therefore, this study was aimed to assess the prevalence of different endoscopic findings in patients with dysphagia and evaluate their association with gender and age groups.


Methodology: This prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at Patel Hospital, Karachi, over one year (October 2023–October 2024) using consecutive non-probability sampling. 173 dysphagia patients above 18 years undergoing upper GI endoscopy were included, while those with a history of upper GI surgery or unfit for the procedure were excluded. After informed consent, patients underwent history-taking, physical examination, and endoscopic evaluation, with findings documented and tissue samples sent for histopathology if needed. The chi-square test was performed to evaluate the association between endoscopic findings and age, gender, and clinical symptoms, keeping p-value of <0.05 as significant.


Results: The study findings showed that, out of 173 patients, a mean age of 49.79 ± 18.3 years, with a male predominance (56.6%). Patients were categorized into young (18–30 years, 18.5%), middle-aged (31–50 years, 31.8%), and older (≥51 years, 49.7%). Vomiting 32(18.5%) was the most common symptom, followed by weight loss 25(14.5%), and heartburn 23(13.3%), while food bolus impaction was least reported 2(1.2%). The most frequent endoscopic findings included esophageal growth 46(26.5%), benign stricture 27(15.6%), and esophagitis 18(10.4%), with malignancies more common in older males. Therapeutic interventions included SEMS placement for growth 17(9.8%), dilatation for benign stricture 24 (13.8%) and web 11(6.3%), and PEG tube placement 4(2.3%), with significant associations (p<0.0005).


Conclusion: This study found a higher prevalence of malignant etiology in older individuals, with esophageal growth being the most common endoscopic finding in males, and benign esophageal strictures in females. A significant association was observed between clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ENDOSCOPIC EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH DYSPHAGIA. (2025). The Research of Medical Science Review, 3(3), 1103-1110. http://thermsr.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/865