PNEUMATIC VS LASER LITHOTRIPSY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PROXIMAL URETERIC STONE
Keywords:
Laser Lithotripsy, Management, Pneumatic Lithotripsy, Proximal Ureteric StoneAbstract
To compare the outcomes of pneumatic and laser lithotripsy among patients with proximal ureteric
stones. The prospective randomized control trial study was conducted in the Department of Urology,
Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation (SIUT), Karachi. Patients between the age group 18-
70 years old, either gender with a size 8-15 mm proximal ureteric stones were included through
non-probability consecutive sampling, which were assigned to two equal groups of pneumatic
lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy. Patients were subjected to a CT KUB scan to confirm the presence
and size of ureteric stones. The empirical antibiotics were given both just before the procedure
(preoperative) and at least 5 days post-procedure or more. The follow-up assessment was noted
after 4 weeks, to assess the outcomes like stone clearance, migration, and need of any secondary
intervention. The SPSS version 26.0 was used to analyze the collected data with 95% C. I and 5%
level of significance. The mean ± standard deviation of age in the pneumatic group was 40.83 ±
14.09 and laser group was 40.40 ± 14.28 years. In the pneumatic group, 48.6% were male and
62.9% were female while in the laser group, 51.4 were males and 37.1% were females. Stone
clearance was significantly higher in the laser group (74.3%) compared to the pneumatic group
(48.6%), stone migration was more common in the pneumatic group (42.9%) compared to the laser
group (14.3%), and the need for secondary intervention was higher in the pneumatic group (51.4%)
than in the laser group (28.6%). The results of this study indicate that laser lithotripsy was more
efficacious in the treatment of proximal ureteric stones compared to pneumatic lithotripsy with
higher stone clearance, and lower rates of migration. Although more time and expense are required
for laser lithotripsy, its low requirement of secondary interventions makes it the preferable option.
For these particularly high-risk cases, laser lithotripsy should be selected to minimize stone
migration and promote clearance. Larger studies are warranted to validate these results and to
inform treatment algorithms.Laser Lithotripsy, Management, Pneumatic Lithotripsy, Proximal
Ureteric Stone
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ammarah Qazi, Syed Saeed Abidi, Bakhtawar Soomro, Adil Hussain, Jaipal Dass, Sajid Atif Aleem (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.